Category talk:Chrono Trigger Techs: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (6 revisions from chrono:Category talk:Chrono Trigger Techs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think that it's good as is. There would be some confusion, like in the case of [[Wind Slash]] where it's a Physical Tech but grealy factors in your Magic stat and performs magical damage (like if someone has a Physical barrier up you can use this). Or something. [[User:Boligao|Boligao]] 05:50, July 19, 2011 (UTC)Boligao | I think that it's good as is. There would be some confusion, like in the case of [[Wind Slash]] where it's a Physical Tech but grealy factors in your Magic stat and performs magical damage (like if someone has a Physical barrier up you can use this). Or something. [[User:Boligao|Boligao]] 05:50, July 19, 2011 (UTC)Boligao | ||
What about simply adding "offensive" and "non-offensive" tech categories? Also, I was thinking of splitting them into Double, Triple, and Single Techs -- {{CC}} techs could also fall into these categories as well. --—[[User:Deyvid Petteys| <span style="color:#4B0082; font face=Edwardian Script ITC;">Radical D </span>]] <small> [[User talk:Deyvid Petteys| <span style="color:#BA55D3; text-shadow: yellow 0 0 4px 4px;"> <sup>(bother \ </sup></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Deyvid Petteys|<span style="color:#BA55D3; text-shadow: yellow 0 0 4px 4px;"> <sup>stalk)</sup></span>]]</small> 06:08, July 19, 2011 (UTC) | |||
I love the idea of changing it to Single, Double and Triple techs, as that's useful and extremely easy to categorize. All other ideas so far seem just too complicated and/or uninteresting/useless for anyone who would read the article. [[User:Boligao|Boligao]] 06:19, July 19, 2011 (UTC)Boligao | |||
Everyone except me T_T. Lol. Nah. You're right. It's not a big deal. I'll start adding categories. I'm going to add a plain-jane "Tech" category" which will branch into CT Techs, CC Techs, then Single Techs, Double Techs, etc. --—[[User:Deyvid Petteys| <span style="color:#4B0082; font face=Edwardian Script ITC;">Radical D </span>]] <small> [[User talk:Deyvid Petteys| <span style="color:#BA55D3; text-shadow: yellow 0 0 4px 4px;"> <sup>(bother \ </sup></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Deyvid Petteys|<span style="color:#BA55D3; text-shadow: yellow 0 0 4px 4px;"> <sup>stalk)</sup></span>]]</small> 06:22, July 19, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:54, 31 July 2011
I feel that this Category can be split into several other subcategories. For instance, Magic Techs and Physical Techs. Or Elemental Techs. Or Shadow Techs. Defensive Techs might be another one (non-offensive techs could be another). Thoughts? --— Radical D (bother \ stalk) 05:34, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
I think that it's good as is. There would be some confusion, like in the case of Wind Slash where it's a Physical Tech but grealy factors in your Magic stat and performs magical damage (like if someone has a Physical barrier up you can use this). Or something. Boligao 05:50, July 19, 2011 (UTC)Boligao
What about simply adding "offensive" and "non-offensive" tech categories? Also, I was thinking of splitting them into Double, Triple, and Single Techs -- Chrono Cross techs could also fall into these categories as well. --— Radical D (bother \ stalk) 06:08, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
I love the idea of changing it to Single, Double and Triple techs, as that's useful and extremely easy to categorize. All other ideas so far seem just too complicated and/or uninteresting/useless for anyone who would read the article. Boligao 06:19, July 19, 2011 (UTC)Boligao
Everyone except me T_T. Lol. Nah. You're right. It's not a big deal. I'll start adding categories. I'm going to add a plain-jane "Tech" category" which will branch into CT Techs, CC Techs, then Single Techs, Double Techs, etc. --— Radical D (bother \ stalk) 06:22, July 19, 2011 (UTC)