4,786
edits
(→Walkthrough Namespace: new section) |
|||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
*[[User:SilverCrono|SC]]- I agree. We can do it, Chrono Wiki! We can be the best out there! --20:14, September 16, 2010 (UTC) | *[[User:SilverCrono|SC]]- I agree. We can do it, Chrono Wiki! We can be the best out there! --20:14, September 16, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*We currently have a little over 450 stubs! Great job knocking it down from 700! Almost there for the 250 the wikia staff need to qualify us for the Wikia Spotlight! And yes SC we can be the best wiki out there! <big>'''[[User:Zeypher|<font color="Red">Zey</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk: Zeypher|<font color="Silver">pher</font>]]</sup>'''</big> 20:54, September 16, 2010 (UTC) | *We currently have a little over 450 stubs! Great job knocking it down from 700! Almost there for the 250 the wikia staff need to qualify us for the Wikia Spotlight! And yes SC we can be the best wiki out there! <big>'''[[User:Zeypher|<font color="Red">Zey</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk: Zeypher|<font color="Silver">pher</font>]]</sup>'''</big> 20:54, September 16, 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Walkthrough Namespace == | |||
00:00, September 19, 2010 (UTC) | |||
I want your opinion of how you think of the [[Walkthrough:Index|walkthrough namespace]] so far. I know we don't really have a lot of walkthrough interpretations, but don't make a judgment of the quantity but the quality of how it is presented. (Hope that makes sense...) And of course we are always looking for more variety of walkthroughs. Got any ideas for improvement or suggestion. Pop it in the comments! | |||
<poll> | |||
Your opinion of the Walkthrough Namespace? (Comment below as well) | |||
It's great | |||
Okay | |||
Needs work | |||
Don't need it | |||
</poll> | |||
==Comments== | |||
* |